Difference between revisions of "List of all-time ISFL win-loss records"

From Sim Football Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 41: Line 41:
 
! Rank !! Team !! {{tooltip|GP|Total games played}} !! Won !! Lost !! Pct.  !! Last playoff appearance !! Division
 
! Rank !! Team !! {{tooltip|GP|Total games played}} !! Won !! Lost !! Pct.  !! Last playoff appearance !! Division
 
|- align="center"
 
|- align="center"
| 1 || [[Arizona Outlaws]] || 9 || 6 || 3 || {{Winning percentage|6|3}} || {{nsfly|7}} || bgcolor="#D0E7FF" | [[ASFC]]
+
| 1 || [[New Orleans Second Line]] || 8 || 6 || 2 || {{Winning percentage|6|2}} || {{nsfly|11}} || bgcolor="#D0E7FF" | [[ASFC]]
 
|- align="center"
 
|- align="center"
| 2 || [[New Orleans Second Line]] || 6 || 4 || 2 || {{Winning percentage|4|2}} || {{nsfly|10}} || [[ASFC]]
+
| 2 || [[Arizona Outlaws]] || 9 || 6 || 3 || {{Winning percentage|6|3}} || {{nsfly|13}} || [[ASFC]]
 
|- align="center"
 
|- align="center"
| 3 || [[Orange County Otters]] || 14 || 7 || 7 || {{Winning percentage|7|7}} || {{nsfly|10}} || [[ASFC]]
+
| 3 || [[Baltimore Hawks]] || 17 || 9 || 8 || {{Winning percentage|9|8}} || {{nsfly|15}} || bgcolor="#D0E7FF" | [[NSFC]]
 
|- align="center"
 
|- align="center"
| 4 || [[Baltimore Hawks]] || 10 || 5 || 5 || {{Winning percentage|5|5}} || {{nsfly|10}} || bgcolor="#D0E7FF" | [[NSFC]]
+
| 4 || [[Orange County Otters]] || 21 || 11 || 10 || {{Winning percentage|11|10}} || {{nsfly|15}} || [[ASFC]]
 
|- align="center"
 
|- align="center"
| 5 || [[Philadelphia Liberty]] || 6 || 3 || 3 || {{Winning percentage|3|3}} || {{nsfly|7}} || [[NSFC]]
+
| 5 || [[San Jose Sabercats]] || 7 || 3 || 4 || {{Winning percentage|3|4}} || {{nsfly|15}} || [[ASFC]]
 
|- align="center"
 
|- align="center"
 
| 6 || [[Yellowknife Wraiths]] || 10 || 4 || 6 || {{Winning percentage|4|6}} || {{nsfly|8}} || [[NSFC]]
 
| 6 || [[Yellowknife Wraiths]] || 10 || 4 || 6 || {{Winning percentage|4|6}} || {{nsfly|8}} || [[NSFC]]
 
|- align="center"
 
|- align="center"
| 7 || [[Colorado Yeti]] || 4 || 1 || 3 || {{Winning percentage|1|3}} || {{nsfly|10}} || [[NSFC]]
+
| 7 || [[Philadelphia Liberty]] || 11 || 4 || 7 || {{Winning percentage|4|7}} || {{nsfly|15}} || [[NSFC]]
 
|- align="center"
 
|- align="center"
| 8 || [[San Jose Sabercats]] || 1 || 0 || 1 || {{Winning percentage|0|1}} || {{nsfly|6}} || [[ASFC]]
+
| 8 || [[Colorado Yeti]] || 7 || 2 || 5 || {{Winning percentage|2|5}} || {{nsfly|13}} || [[NSFC]]
 
|- align="center"
 
|- align="center"
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 12:43, 21 July 2019

The following is a list of win-loss records for each of the 8 active National Simulation Football League (NSFL) teams.

Regular season

The following is a listing of all 8 current National Simulation Football League (NSFL) teams ranked by their regular season win–loss record percentage, accurate as of the end of the 2030 ISFL season.

Best win–loss record in division
Rank Team GP Won Lost Tied Pct. First NSFL Season Division
1 Orange County Otters 210 143 67 0 .681 2016 (S1) ASFC
2 Baltimore Hawks 210 125 85 0 .595 2016 (S1) NSFC
3 Yellowknife Wraiths 210 111 98 1 .531 2016 (S1) NSFC
4 Arizona Outlaws 210 105 105 0 .500 2016 (S1) ASFC
5 Philadelphia Liberty 196 97 98 1 .497 2017 (S2) NSFC
6 San Jose Sabercats 210 96 113 1 .460 2016 (S1) ASFC
7 New Orleans Second Line 196 74 121 1 .380 2017 (S2) ASFC
8 Colorado Yeti 210 73 137 0 .348 2016 (S1) NSFC

Playoffs

The following is a listing of all 8 current National Simulation Football League (NSFL) teams ranked by their postseason win–loss record percentage, accurate as of the end of the 2025 ISFL season.

Best win–loss record in division
Rank Team GP Won Lost Pct. Last playoff appearance Division
1 New Orleans Second Line 8 6 2 .750 2026 (S11) ASFC
2 Arizona Outlaws 9 6 3 .667 2028 (S13) ASFC
3 Baltimore Hawks 17 9 8 .529 2030 (S15) NSFC
4 Orange County Otters 21 11 10 .524 2030 (S15) ASFC
5 San Jose Sabercats 7 3 4 .429 2030 (S15) ASFC
6 Yellowknife Wraiths 10 4 6 .400 2023 (S8) NSFC
7 Philadelphia Liberty 11 4 7 .364 2030 (S15) NSFC
8 Colorado Yeti 7 2 5 .286 2028 (S13) NSFC

See also